NATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON ATHLETICS REFORM HELD AT THE HOTEL INTERCONTINENTAL NEW ORLEANS, LOUISIANA PRESENTED BY TULANE UNIVERSITY NOVEMBER 11, 2003 SECOND PANEL DISCUSSION: "POSTSEASON FOOTBALL PLAY AND THE BOWL CHAMPIONSHIP SERIES: A CONVERSATION" PROCEEDINGS REPORTED BY: SIMONE R. BERTUCCI, CERTIFIED COURT REPORTER ALLIANCE REPORTING, INC. 4919 Canal Street - Suite 303 New Orleans, Louisiana 70119 (504) 488-6624 2 1 MODERATOR: 2 LEN ELMORE Attorney 3 ESPN Sports Analyst Former NBA Player and Writer 4 PANELISTS: 5 BRITTON BANOWSKY 6 Commissioner, Conference USA 7 PETER DALIS Consultant and Former Athletics Director, UCLA 8 CRAIG THOMPSON 9 Commissioner, The Mountain West Conference 10 TODD TURNER 11 Former Athletics Director, Vanderbilt University 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 ALLIANCE REPORTING, INC. 4919 Canal Street - Suite 303 New Orleans, Louisiana 70119 (504) 488-6624 3 1 2 I N D E X 3 4 Opening Remarks: 5 LEN ELMORE........................... 4 6 7 Address by Panelists: 8 PETER DALIS.......................... 10 9 BRITTON BANOWSKY..................... 17 10 CRAIG THOMPSON....................... 25 11 TODD TURNER.......................... 34 12 13 Question and Answer Session............... 46 14 15 Comments by Panelists..................... 58 16 17 Closing Remarks 18 SCOTT S. COWEN....................... 64 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 ALLIANCE REPORTING, INC. 4919 Canal Street - Suite 303 New Orleans, Louisiana 70119 (504) 488-6624 4 1 MR. ELMORE: 2 First of all, thanks to all of you 3 for sticking around after the last panel. It's 4 almost kind of anticlimactic in some respects to 5 follow the brain trusts of universities across 6 the nation. 7 The title of our panel is 8 "Postseason Football Play and the Bowl 9 Championship Series: A Conversation," but just 10 to caution you, we're not going to stick solely 11 on the Bowl Championship Series controversy, 12 simply because there is so much more to talk 13 about, but certainly this will be a prime subject 14 of conversation. 15 Before we get started, I pretty 16 much want to let you know that the format will be 17 just about the same as the first one. We'll 18 introduce our panelists, they'll have an 19 opportunity to address you, and then certainly 20 we'll take questions and maybe ask questions 21 among ourselves. But, first, let me weigh in a 22 little bit, particularly about the postseason 23 football play and the Bowl Championship Series, 24 kind of a little change of pace from what we did 25 in the first panel. ALLIANCE REPORTING, INC. 4919 Canal Street - Suite 303 New Orleans, Louisiana 70119 (504) 488-6624 5 1 You talk about the words integrity, 2 credibility, accountability, fairness. These are 3 the watchwords the clarion calls for the most 4 recent period of reform in intercollegiate 5 athletics. Invariably among reform targets are 6 the major sports, those inextricably welded to 7 revenue opportunities. Regardless of the 8 endeavor, there's good and there's bad associated 9 with the pursuit of the almighty dollar, as we 10 all know. Even more importantly, or maybe more 11 philosophically, in the pursuit of the dollar, 12 the debate over how much is enough is what 13 reigns. These observations and the inevitable 14 questions associated with today's reform process 15 become ever more puzzling in light of the 16 following: 17 In 1996 in response to a different 18 round of scandal, the NCAA governing structure 19 was altered to strip individual athletic 20 departments of their apparent autonomy. In the 21 spirit of reform, that system was replaced with a 22 system that featured university presidents in 23 control. They were to provide a more reasoned 24 oversight towards maintaining the balance between 25 athletics and overall institutional goals, and ALLIANCE REPORTING, INC. 4919 Canal Street - Suite 303 New Orleans, Louisiana 70119 (504) 488-6624 6 1 the majority of chief executives governed this 2 area with a focus on balance and with 3 perspective. Along with the new NCAA management 4 regime now led by Doctor Brand, most university 5 presidents continue to reconcile the foremost job 6 of educating students and developing leaders with 7 its complementary and subordinate yet all too 8 independent relationship with athletics. 9 To accept the challenge of change, 10 we must accept reality and proceed from there. 11 The effort to maximize the economic opportunities 12 developed because of revenue-generating sports 13 has led us to where we are today. I believe that 14 it's ludicrous that anyone would believe that an 15 institution or group of institutions would walk 16 away from millions of TV dollars presented by a 17 particular alignment. The NCAA-CBS arrangement 18 in college basketball has meant millions and even 19 a billion dollars divided among Division I 20 participants in basketball. And it is equally 21 ludicrous to believe that TV network and college 22 sports arrangements have to be exclusionary in 23 its operation among Division IA football 24 programs, as the current BCS arrangement appears 25 on its face. ALLIANCE REPORTING, INC. 4919 Canal Street - Suite 303 New Orleans, Louisiana 70119 (504) 488-6624 7 1 Again, the NCAA basketball 2 tournament, while working out its quirks, will 3 and still affords every player, every team, every 4 school, a chance to dream of winning a national 5 championship. On the first day of practice, they 6 can all rely on the chance, regardless of how 7 minuscule, that they could win at all, and it's 8 this access that creates and perpetuates 9 universal interest. This access is a major 10 ingredient that helps bind college and university 11 communities across our land. 12 In the current BCS controversy we 13 have about 63 schools sharing in almost a half 14 billion dollars over the last five years, but 54 15 schools on the outside looking in are left to 16 divide approximately 16 million dollars. The 17 student athletes from these schools and their 18 institutions all endure the same rigors and make 19 the same sacrifices, yet for the student athletes 20 of the "have-nots," there is no dream because 21 there is no access. 22 It's about balance. It's about the 23 proper apportioning of priorities within 24 institutions and among their goals, but certainly 25 it's about the money, and it's also about how ALLIANCE REPORTING, INC. 4919 Canal Street - Suite 303 New Orleans, Louisiana 70119 (504) 488-6624 8 1 much and to whom. It's about fairness, it's 2 about credibility, and it's about integrity. 3 There are those who aver and say this controversy 4 is about tradition. I don't disagree, but the 5 issues also concern accountability, and 6 accountability in defining and then carrying out 7 what college sports should truly be about. 8 So the issues remain myriad, the 9 negotiations at times seem downright contentious. 10 Fortunately, as this symposium demonstrates, the 11 discourse continues towards resolution. So, with 12 that, we're honored to have some of the brightest 13 minds in the administration of intercollegiate 14 athletics here with us to discuss the swirling 15 issues surrounding college football, postseason 16 play, the Bowl Championship Series alignment, 17 and, of course, athletic reform. 18 So starting at my far right, 19 jointing us today is Peter Dalis. Peter is a 20 consultant. He retired as athletic director of 21 UCLA in 2002. He served in the position for 19 22 years and spent 47 years on the UCLA campus as a 23 student and administrator. While athletics 24 director, he chaired many committees in the 25 Pac-10 Conference, predominantly in the ALLIANCE REPORTING, INC. 4919 Canal Street - Suite 303 New Orleans, Louisiana 70119 (504) 488-6624 9 1 television area. 2 To my near right is Britton 3 Banowsky, who was named commissioner of 4 Conference USA in 2002 and has more than 15 5 years' experience as a collegiate conference 6 administrator. He came to Conference USA from 7 the Big 12 Conference where he was associate 8 commissioner. Previously he was commissioner of 9 the Southland Conference. Britton has served on 10 several national committees, including the NCAA 11 Special Committee to Review Marketing and 12 Licensing Activities, and the NCAA Division I 13 Management Council. He's secretary-treasurer of 14 the Collegiate Commissioners Association. 15 On my near left is Craig Thompson 16 who joined the Mountain West Conference as 17 commissioner in 1998. Previously Craig served as 18 commissioner of the Sun Belt Conference for 19 almost 12 years and served as the only 20 commissioner of the American South Conference 21 prior to the merger of the two leagues in 1991. 22 He is active on the national level, serving on 23 the NCAA Men's Basketball Issues Committee, and 24 he was chair of the Division I Men's Basketball 25 Committee. He works extensively also with the ALLIANCE REPORTING, INC. 4919 Canal Street - Suite 303 New Orleans, Louisiana 70119 (504) 488-6624 10 1 National Association of Collegiate Directors of 2 Athletics. 3 And to my far left is Todd Turner, a 4 27-year veteran of NCAA Division I 5 intercollegiate athletics. He's a former 6 athletics director at Vanderbilt, and previously 7 he was athletics director at North Carolina State 8 University and University of Connecticut. He 9 recently served on the NCAA Academics, 10 Eligibility, Compliance Cabinet, and that body's 11 subcommittee on recruiting. Todd also is 12 involved in the NCAA's academic reform 13 initiatives and chairs the NCAA Management 14 Council's Working Group on Incentives and 15 Disincentives tied to academic performance. 16 Again, in keeping with the format 17 that we had in the first panel discussion, we're 18 going to allow our panelists approximately ten 19 minutes to discuss whatever it is they would 20 like. Peter, would you start? 21 MR. DALIS: 22 Thanks, Len. 23 Having heard those three very 24 eminent people begin our panel this morning, I 25 was reminded of something that George Bernard ALLIANCE REPORTING, INC. 4919 Canal Street - Suite 303 New Orleans, Louisiana 70119 (504) 488-6624 11 1 Shaw said and wrote, and that is, "The danger in 2 communication is the illusion that it took 3 place." Having been an athletic director at UCLA 4 for 19 years, and having worked with many of the 5 CEOs here and in the Pac-10 and the Big 10, I 6 really didn't hear of the kind of conversations 7 that were expressed up here today. So athletic 8 directors went on to do the business that they 9 felt was important that the institution wanted 10 them to carry out, and in that process football 11 is a very large part of that. 12 And I want to emphasize the one 13 thing I learned in the 19 years about football is 14 that it is somewhat of a geographic phenomena, 15 that you-all down here take it somewhat more 16 seriously than some of us out on the other 17 coasts, and it's very important to your 18 community, and it's a very important ingredient 19 for the culture that you prescribe to. 20 But I want to focus just a little 21 bit on the postseason bowl play-off system and 22 the traditional bowl system because I've lived 23 under both. What I call now -- not the BCS -- I 24 call it the decimal dilemma. I believe it is 25 something that's not particularly healthy for ALLIANCE REPORTING, INC. 4919 Canal Street - Suite 303 New Orleans, Louisiana 70119 (504) 488-6624 12 1 intercollegiate athletics and sport and the value 2 that is inherent in sport. 3 And I want to go back a little bit 4 by saying when I first came to UCLA in 1983, we 5 really had what was a traditional January 1 bowl 6 system, and people wanted to go to those bowl 7 games, and certain people went to those bowl 8 games because they had tie-ups, so forth. And 9 then there was another tier of bowl games that 10 were reasonably healthy experiences for young 11 people who wanted to play in them; and, by the 12 way, they enjoyed it, they really did, and they 13 looked forward to going to bowl games. 14 But as America's appetite for having 15 a national championship grew in the sport of 16 football, some people designed and divined 17 something to avoid a play-off. I will tell you 18 right now that I am in the miniority among most 19 athletic directors. I believe initially that we 20 should have a play-off. I saw no inherent reason 21 why we couldn't, given all the championship 22 opportunities we have in all other sports in the 23 NCAA. As a matter of record, I would tell you 24 that my experience -- and it's anecdotal and it's 25 at UCLA -- the least-impacted student athlete ALLIANCE REPORTING, INC. 4919 Canal Street - Suite 303 New Orleans, Louisiana 70119 (504) 488-6624 13 1 academically during the season was football than 2 any other sport I had to deal with, be it golf, 3 tennis, volleyball, basketball, because 4 traditionally teams left on a Friday if they were 5 going somewhere, they played on a Saturday, and 6 that was it. And their bowl experience, when it 7 took place, typically happened after final exams, 8 at least in the quarter system schools where I 9 was a part of. So the argument that it's 10 impactful academically, I'm not altogether sure 11 how real that is from my anecdotal, limited, 12 19-year experience. And I think the play-off is 13 important because I think it's fair, and I think 14 it would resonate in America, because I think in 15 America that's such a major part of our culture. 16 In addition to that, I was lucky 17 enough to be at a university that wanted to excel 18 at everything, and that included intercollegiate 19 athletics, and we were proud to have won more 20 national championships combined in all sports 21 over the years than anyone else had, and that 22 became part of why we existed at UCLA, and it was 23 an important part, and it was one that I heard 24 about quite a bit. And the one thing that I find 25 very curious that we never really talk about ALLIANCE REPORTING, INC. 4919 Canal Street - Suite 303 New Orleans, Louisiana 70119 (504) 488-6624 14 1 enough in intercollegiate athletics when we try 2 to effect change, if we want to, is that we don't 3 talk enough about our external community. 4 Our internal community is loud, it 5 tells us what its mission is, academia and so 6 forth; but our external community plays a major 7 role in how the rest of the university operates, 8 and that external community often wants to be a 9 champion. If it's not a champion, it wants the 10 opportunity to be a champion. It's important for 11 their ethos, it's important for their collective 12 ego. There are a number of reasons why they want 13 to do it. Having said that, I think a play-off 14 would be the most natural way to accomplish that. 15 Now, something happened last year 16 in the Los Angeles area. The L.A. Times wrote an 17 editorial regarding the Rose Bowl, and I may say 18 the L.A. Times editorial staff never weighs in on 19 anything athletic, but it did in this occasion 20 last December. It decried the fact that they no 21 longer had the Pac-10 - Big 10 matchup, which is 22 important to our community and our side of the 23 country as well as, I think, the middle part of 24 the country. That was the result of, of course, 25 the abandonment of the old traditional bowl ALLIANCE REPORTING, INC. 4919 Canal Street - Suite 303 New Orleans, Louisiana 70119 (504) 488-6624 15 1 system now trying to join another system to try 2 to accommodate a championship. 3 Some of us came up with an idea 4 several years ago -- in fact, Chuck Young who was 5 the former chancellor at UCLA and now the interim 6 president at the University of Florida -- where 7 we could accomplish, we think, all those things. 8 By having a playoff system with eight teams -- 9 and I say eight teams guardedly because that 10 doesn't really answer all the questions that 11 people might have in the country if they're 12 interested in a playoff, but it would be a start, 13 and it would be similar to the NCAA basketball 14 tournament. When I was at UCLA in my student 15 days, there were only 16 teams going to the NCAA 16 Championship, and that grew, and I think this 17 would have an opportunity to grow as well. 18 I believe, as I said, it would 19 resonate in America. I think it would be a 20 commercial success, and I don't think 21 commercialism in itself is as bad as everyone has 22 portrayed it to be. I think it's an important 23 part of our culture and an important part of how 24 we exist in this country and, quite frankly, want 25 others to exist in the rest of the world. ALLIANCE REPORTING, INC. 4919 Canal Street - Suite 303 New Orleans, Louisiana 70119 (504) 488-6624 16 1 But we thought that we would create 2 a system where you could accomplish having a 3 playoff, maintain the traditional January bowl 4 games with the old alignments that existed 5 before, but as important, with the additional 6 revenues -- and I know there would be additional 7 revenues, I've talked to the television networks 8 about this -- to have some of that money 9 subsidize some of the second tier bowl games that 10 don't get much public attention, but they should. 11 Because what's happened to the second tier bowl 12 games is, they basically exist on the backs of 13 institutions and conferences, that they no longer 14 have the community support, many of them, that 15 they historically had, and so when institutions 16 want opportunities to participate postseason, you 17 basically buy your way in to some degree, and 18 that is something I think is abhorrent for 19 institutions to have to do. So I think we could 20 have a win on both sides of that. 21 One of the things we studied while 22 we were looking at this was what is the academic 23 impact if you were to have playoff that went on 24 beyond traditional January 1, or January 4th in 25 this case, and how would it impact ALLIANCE REPORTING, INC. 4919 Canal Street - Suite 303 New Orleans, Louisiana 70119 (504) 488-6624 17 1 institutionally. One of the things we looked at 2 was, during the first two weekends of January, 43 3 percent of the schools in all the conferences are 4 not in school. So the first two weeks of January 5 are easily adaptable if one were to try to 6 attempt to have a football playoff system. 7 So I raise these because these are 8 the issues that presidents and some other ADs and 9 conference commissioners raise from time to time 10 when this issue comes up. But I think that if we 11 were to continue to have the kind of importance 12 that we place on sports, and admittedly I was an 13 athletic director, so it was a little bit more 14 important than a lot of other people, I think the 15 only way we should go is a playoff, that it's 16 eminently fair and in the best interest of the 17 sport in the long term. Thank you. 18 (Applause) 19 MR. BANOWSKY: 20 Hello, I'm Britton Banowsky, 21 commissioner of Conference USA, and I do 22 appreciate the opportunity to be here. I think 23 I'm here because Scott had a hard time getting 24 someone from a BCS conference to be here, and I 25 actually used to work in the Big 12, so I guess ALLIANCE REPORTING, INC. 4919 Canal Street - Suite 303 New Orleans, Louisiana 70119 (504) 488-6624 18 1 I'm as close as you're going to get today. 2 What I'd like to do is -- and I 3 realize in doing so I'm probably going to forfeit 4 my honorarium and whatever bonus that I might 5 get. I'm going to focus my remarks, at least my 6 preliminary remarks on athletics reform from the 7 perspective of an administrator. I know we had a 8 lot of presidents that were weighing in earlier, 9 and I think there's some balance to the 10 conversation that might be helpful. 11 I agree with most who have suggested 12 that athletics reform is not a destination. To 13 me it's simply a discussion that helps us keep 14 some balance between the entertainment and 15 commercial values that are a big part of what we 16 do in college athletics, any inherent educational 17 values, and to me it's also about constantly 18 reminding ourselves to do what's right relative 19 to intercollegiate athletics. 20 If I were grading the leadership of 21 college sports on the topics of reform, my grade 22 on the report card would go something like this, 23 and I'm including a grade relative to postseason 24 football. In the area of academics reform, I 25 would give us an "A." I think from my vantage ALLIANCE REPORTING, INC. 4919 Canal Street - Suite 303 New Orleans, Louisiana 70119 (504) 488-6624 19 1 point there's been a wonderful national broad 2 support for these ideas about putting the student 3 back into student athlete, as Scott suggested, 4 and I think that the standards that we enacted 5 which will operate to ensure that students who 6 are eligible are on track to graduate. I mean, 7 from my perspective that's a big deal, and we 8 shouldn't lose sight of that. That's something 9 that I have not seen before in my experience in 10 college athletics, and it should be wonderful to 11 see once it gets traction. 12 I've also had the pleasure of 13 working with Todd Turner in a group that's looked 14 at trying to come up with new measurement tools 15 for student athlete academic success. One of the 16 things I think everyone can agree on is that the 17 federal student athlete graduation rate is 18 flawed, and so the idea of having a management 19 tool for a president to use that's real time to 20 evaluate a coach and how well he does with a 21 certain class of student athletes is pretty 22 meaningful. And so I think that's a great idea. 23 And then I think Todd is going to bring home this 24 system of incentive and disincentive program, and 25 I don't know if he'll elaborate on that, but this ALLIANCE REPORTING, INC. 4919 Canal Street - Suite 303 New Orleans, Louisiana 70119 (504) 488-6624 20 1 is an idea where we basically do as Scott 2 suggested: We reward those programs that do 3 well, and we look to penalize those that don't do 4 well in the context of academic performance of 5 their student athletes. 6 The second subject or topic is 7 student athlete welfare. Here I don't give us an 8 "A," I give us a "B." I think many of us have 9 continuing concerns about the time demands issue, 10 and it's hard because on the one hand you've got 11 football players and coaches that are motivated 12 to make sure their kids are big and strong, and 13 in some cases the student athletes that need the 14 most academic help are the student athletes that 15 are being pushed to spend the most amount of time 16 on the field or on the court, but you've also got 17 some high-achieving student athletes, both 18 athletically and academically that are swimmers 19 and Olympic sport participants that can make 20 straight As and they can also train for the 21 Olympics. So balancing that is pretty hard. So 22 I think we've done a pretty good job in that 23 area, but I think there's more work to be done. 24 In the area of student athlete 25 welfare relative to benefits and opportunities, I ALLIANCE REPORTING, INC. 4919 Canal Street - Suite 303 New Orleans, Louisiana 70119 (504) 488-6624 21 1 applaud the NCAA. There's more funding available 2 for student athletes than there's ever been 3 before. We have a special assistance fund to 4 meet particular needs of student athletes. We 5 have a new opportunity fund. So the idea that 6 student athletes are being exploited widely I 7 think is an idea that is lesser today than it was 8 before. I think that's a tribute really to the 9 leadership. So in that area I give us a "B." 10 In the area of financial management 11 and control, I've got to give us a "C." I think 12 we generally do what most other systems do, and 13 families do for that matter, and we spend what we 14 have. We spend what we get, and I think that the 15 unfortunate part of this from my perspective is, 16 while the labor costs in college athletics, i.e. 17 the cost of student athletes, is relatively 18 constant -- I know tuition costs are going up -- 19 the money that gets pumped into the system 20 generally goes to salaries and it goes to 21 facilities. I've seen some of the most 22 remarkable locker rooms you can imagine. They 23 rival those of the best professional sports 24 teams. So whether or not that's a good use of 25 those resources I think is fair analysis, so I ALLIANCE REPORTING, INC. 4919 Canal Street - Suite 303 New Orleans, Louisiana 70119 (504) 488-6624 22 1 give us a "C" in that area. I hope we can do 2 better. I'm not sure what we can do. I think 3 getting our arms around that is pretty tricky. 4 The area that I give us a "D" in is 5 leadership, behavior and attitudes. This is the 6 way we act as administrators and coaches and 7 leaders of higher education, and this year has 8 really been a bad year for us, I think. I think 9 we've had more coaches' scandals and more 10 university scandals that have captured the 11 headlines than we've had in a long time, and 12 these things have really, I think, operated to 13 detract from the good stories in college 14 athletics. The men's basketball coaches are 15 having ethics summits to try and address some of 16 these things. 17 I think in the conference 18 realignment business -- and I have some personal 19 knowledge of how that works -- I think we've lost 20 a little bit of credibility there, I really do. 21 I think that we got started off on the wrong 22 foot. It concerns me, and I don't want to be 23 critical because you never know when your time 24 will come, but when a college president in 25 relating or describing the position of his ALLIANCE REPORTING, INC. 4919 Canal Street - Suite 303 New Orleans, Louisiana 70119 (504) 488-6624 23 1 conference relative to adding Boston College, and 2 he relates it to a suit that he was going to wear 3 for a while and try out, but then it needed to be 4 altered again, I think that shows a lack of 5 sensitivity on the system. I think that's the 6 real problem we have from an individual 7 leadership and attitude standpoint. We're so 8 self-interest motivated that we lose sight of 9 what's good for the system. So I'm hopeful that 10 over time we'll be able to get a greater sense of 11 collective interest, but I'm not real hopeful for 12 that in the short-run. 13 And then on to postseason football, 14 which is my final category. Here I think the 15 grade is "Incomplete." I'm not ready to give a 16 grade. We've got a meeting coming up this next 17 week that's very important. You know, it depends 18 on who you're talking to as well when you're 19 trying to ascertain the degree to which reform is 20 necessary in college football. I see bowl people 21 in the room. I'm sure from a bowl 22 administrator's perspective, the degree of reform 23 is minimal that's needed. Personally, I think 24 there's great value in the bowl system, but I 25 think most would say there's some flaws in the ALLIANCE REPORTING, INC. 4919 Canal Street - Suite 303 New Orleans, Louisiana 70119 (504) 488-6624 24 1 system that need to be corrected. I think right 2 now determining who's number one and number two, 3 you know, it's a real challenging situation for 4 all of college athletics, and we have a 5 controversy set up each year around that. I 6 believe that the one network system we're in 7 right now, i.e. ABC and ESPN controlling most of 8 postseason football is not necessarily the 9 healthiest environment. 10 The biggest thing for me, working 11 for the organization that I do, is providing some 12 form of meaningful access to the student athletes 13 that work real hard to start the season and 14 compete at a very high level. I think that the 15 events in the next few weeks and months will 16 really tell us a lot about our collective 17 willingness to engage in a meaningful discussion 18 about change in this area, and I'm hopeful that 19 principles of inclusion and fairness will be 20 tested in the process. I'm sure they will. 21 But I'm optimistic. Personally I'm 22 optimistic that college athletics is moving in 23 the right direction. I'm pleased with the 24 leadership. I'm optimistic that we can make 25 progress on the football postseason issue. ALLIANCE REPORTING, INC. 4919 Canal Street - Suite 303 New Orleans, Louisiana 70119 (504) 488-6624 25 1 Overall, we're not making the honor roll, but I 2 think I would have to give us a passing grade in 3 college athletics. 4 (Applause) 5 MR. THOMPSON: 6 First, I don't think anybody has 7 said this yet, but I'd like to thank Doctor Cowen 8 and his staff for putting on this symposium, very 9 important, very topical, and appreciate the 10 opportunity. And, second, to show my bias, the 11 fact that you put it on in New Orleans gives me a 12 chance to come back to a city I lived in for 13 twelve years, and I'm a father of two native New 14 Orleanians, and get to see some friends while 15 we're here. So I appreciate on both regards, 16 Doctor Cowen. 17 You know, it wouldn't be a complete 18 day in my life if I didn't talk about the BCS a 19 little bit. It's kind of consumed me for 20 probably the last year, year and a half. While 21 Doctor Brand brought out a new speech today, this 22 is kind of old and tired. Some of you have heard 23 parts of it, probably most of it, but hopefully 24 there's some new information or some things that 25 at least will give you pause for thought, and we ALLIANCE REPORTING, INC. 4919 Canal Street - Suite 303 New Orleans, Louisiana 70119 (504) 488-6624 26 1 can have some conversation at the end. 2 I completely agree with previous 3 panelists and Doctor Duderstadt's comment about 4 the overcommercialization of college athletics. 5 I don't know how we can get that back. We can 6 work in those regards, but as Len pointed out and 7 others have said, it's such a 8 multimillion-billion dollar industry, that we're 9 not going to be able to go backwards very 10 easily. And depending upon your personal 11 perspective, either the ills of or support for 12 the current college postseason are something that 13 have generated voluminous media coverage. 14 There's not a single day that goes by that 15 columnists, talk show hosts, television 16 reporters, others, don't weigh in on the topic of 17 the BCS, good or bad, chat rooms, internet talk. 18 I've probably personally received in 19 excess of 50 different postseason models, and 20 that's probably scratching the surface. I know 21 that BCS commissioners and maybe Britton and some 22 of the other commissioners, Carl, have received 23 even more, but it's a very important topic to the 24 thread of college football, and I think it's 25 something that, to no great surprise, I feel ALLIANCE REPORTING, INC. 4919 Canal Street - Suite 303 New Orleans, Louisiana 70119 (504) 488-6624 27 1 needs to change, I feel needs to change 2 dramatically. I fall on the side that 3 representing a conference that currently does not 4 have guaranteed access to the BCS is extremely 5 detrimental to the growth and development of a 6 young 4-1/2 year old conference. 7 The real issue beyond the access, 8 and I think that is very important, but I think 9 even the larger issue is probably the branding, 10 the labeling of BCS versus non-BCS. Every day, 11 365 days a year, our coaches, our administrators 12 are trying to build programs and improve their 13 programs. To have this connotation and this 14 split between BCS and non-BCS is absolutely 15 stifling to our programs. The system of "have" 16 "have-nots" that has been created is frustrating 17 because I don't know what the barometers are, how 18 we came to determine who is in and who is out. 19 Certainly with all the conference movement -- and 20 let me go back a moment. 21 Earlier today in a press conference 22 somebody asked me the question about the movement 23 of institutions to new conferences, and I want to 24 go back and touch on one thing. I think a lot of 25 that, if not all of it, was based on, in part, ALLIANCE REPORTING, INC. 4919 Canal Street - Suite 303 New Orleans, Louisiana 70119 (504) 488-6624 28 1 the BCS because there's a better way, a better 2 system, more money, greener pastures, et cetera, 3 and that has been the cause-and-effect. A lot of 4 conferences then had to fill in their numbers and 5 readjust and reappoint placements to keep their A 6 team leagues intact, but I definitely feel that 7 the BCS was a driving force behind much if not 8 all of the movement that we've experienced in the 9 last three to four months. 10 Recruiting has been affected 11 dramatically. Despite the efforts of undefeated 12 teams in the past, including Tulane, Marshall, 13 those institutions in the last four or five years 14 have not been invited to participate in the BCS 15 bowl, and potential student athletes are now 16 choosing other institutions that with one or two 17 losses stand a better chance, probably the only 18 chance of getting into a BCS bowl, where 19 conference members in the five conferences 20 labeled non-BCS do not have that opportunity. 21 A couple of weeks ago Lavelle 22 Edwards, longtime coach at BYU, testified in some 23 Senate hearings about how recruiting affected his 24 last couple years, and it's even more dramatic 25 since Lavelle has left. Kids -- I can document ALLIANCE REPORTING, INC. 4919 Canal Street - Suite 303 New Orleans, Louisiana 70119 (504) 488-6624 29 1 all sorts of cases -- that are choosing BCS 2 institutions that have really legitimately no 3 chance of playing in a BCS bowl, but the fact 4 they are in a BCS conference gives them a leg up 5 on an 11-and-0 or 10-and-1 non-BCS school. We've 6 talked about the financial disparity. Nearly 7 half of the institutions in Division IA are 8 working with maybe 5 percent or less of the 9 revenue generated by the bowl system and the BCS. 10 Another major problem for me, and 11 I've studied this as others have in great detail, 12 is the inequity in the whole system. The formula 13 for selecting a one versus two game and the two 14 at-large in my mind is fundamentally flawed. 15 Seven independent computer rankings are factors 16 as are two human polls. The computer rankings 17 are very disparate. Not all 65 AP pollsters even 18 see how the top 25 performed on a given weekend. 19 They can't watch all those games. Furthermore, 20 they don't know perhaps who was injured, who was 21 not injured, who played. And the coaches then in 22 the ESPN-USA Today poll maybe have an even have 23 less chance to monitor and track what happened on 24 a given Saturday. The last I looked, they're a 25 little busy themselves coaching their team. So I ALLIANCE REPORTING, INC. 4919 Canal Street - Suite 303 New Orleans, Louisiana 70119 (504) 488-6624 30 1 think that that's a problem in both the human 2 polls and in the computer polls. 3 If you look at the discrepancies, 4 I'm going to point out a couple of examples of 5 this week's poll. Again, the basis of both the 6 seven computers and the two polls have to be 7 results: Somebody won, somebody lost. Pretty 8 simple, right? But when you -- I refer to Peter. 9 The decimal point difference is decimal points 10 and basically a beauty pageant, the best way to 11 determine one versus two as well as the other 12 four bowls. 13 Yesterday's rankings, here's a 14 couple of examples: Seven computers. One team 15 in the seven computers was ranked 2nd in a 16 computer poll, 25th in another. Again, same 17 results. Either they won the game or they lost 18 the game, but in one poll they're 2nd, in another 19 poll they're 25th. Another top ten team in the 20 BCS rankings yesterday was 11th in the two human 21 polls, yet 5th in the computer poll. Now, that's 22 quite a discrepancy when that's going to 23 determine who's number one in the national 24 championship game, and two, who is going to be in 25 the other three BCS bowls. ALLIANCE REPORTING, INC. 4919 Canal Street - Suite 303 New Orleans, Louisiana 70119 (504) 488-6624 31 1 The BCS proponents have claimed that 2 the system was set up to establish a true 3 national championship game. I question has this 4 really been true. There's been great fortune in 5 that in the last couple of years there have been 6 two undefeated teams that are going to play in 7 the national championship game. What's going to 8 happen this year, for instance? Right now we 9 currently have two undefeated teams. It doesn't 10 look like there's a chance that those two 11 undefeated teams, if they remain undefeated, if, 12 will play in a national championship game. One 13 would play in a national championship game, and 14 the other one possibly in one of the other three 15 bowls. So which one- or two-loss team will 16 likely play as the Number 2 team in the country 17 in the national championship game? 18 I'm a firm believer that just like 19 the NCA Basketball Selection Committee that 20 annually selects participants, the at-large 21 people in the 65-team tournament, that there's a 22 place for a similar management team in college 23 football. Use the polls, use the computer 24 rankings, but let's bring some knowledgeable 25 people into the process that have a broad ALLIANCE REPORTING, INC. 4919 Canal Street - Suite 303 New Orleans, Louisiana 70119 (504) 488-6624 32 1 representation, not just those six conferences, 2 but the eleven conferences that play IA football, 3 and for the good of higher education, let's bring 4 in that element. We use it in all our other 5 sports. All the other championships at the 6 intercollegiate level have some sort of selection 7 team, have some sort of a management process 8 beyond just the flat-out computers and two human 9 polls. 10 Again, I think the system is 11 inherently unfair. It ignores the opportunity 12 for all Division IA and remains inconsistent with 13 other championships conducted. The system 14 protects arguably 63 institutions. I had a 15 wonderful dinner last night, and Todd has been at 16 a number of institutions that have been in the 17 BCS, and I appreciate his thoughts on it, and 18 it's interesting because no matter which side of 19 the fence you're on, I think we're getting closer 20 to a system now that is a little more compatible 21 and is something that people can all live with 22 different than what we see it today, so 23 encouraged by what's happened over the last two 24 or three months or five or six months. And we so 25 much appreciate Doctor Cowen because he sometimes ALLIANCE REPORTING, INC. 4919 Canal Street - Suite 303 New Orleans, Louisiana 70119 (504) 488-6624 33 1 appears to be the lightning rod on this process, 2 but he speaks for many people, and again, he's 3 got broad shoulders, and we do respect and 4 appreciate that. 5 The BCS system not only, as I hope 6 I've I pointed out, has some flaws, it's also 7 permeated other sports. It's permeated 8 basketball and other issues. Recently a BCS 9 commissioner was quoted as saying, "Every 10 athletic analysis goes through the prism of the 11 BCS," end quote. It's a football issue. Why do 12 we have governance issues and basketball issues 13 and other sport issues, and again the labeling 14 outside of the sport of football in various other 15 championships? It's a football issue. 16 A different commissioner noted that 17 in the new Big East, underlined, Basketball 18 Conference configuration, that the Big East 19 basketball would penetrate 22 percent of the U.S. 20 household television sets, and that facet has to 21 be taken into account when we talk about the 22 potential restructured BCS and automatic 23 guaranteed slots. Are we talking bowl 24 championship series or basketball championship 25 series? Again, a distinction that has carried ALLIANCE REPORTING, INC. 4919 Canal Street - Suite 303 New Orleans, Louisiana 70119 (504) 488-6624 34 1 over into other walks of life beyond just college 2 football. 3 Again, I emphasize, greatly 4 encouraged by the dialogue. Doctor Brand, 5 commissioners, certainly the presidents, a lot of 6 people have weighed in, and hopefully over the 7 coming months, and certainly beginning on Sunday 8 here in New Orleans when the eleven presidents 9 get together again, a more sensible and equitable 10 system can be fashioned. Maybe the best news out 11 of all this is for the first time the process, 12 the system, which was never formally adopted by 13 any kind of membership other than six 14 conferences, four bowls and a network, has never 15 been totally scrutinized as it is today, and for 16 that I'm thankful and appreciative, and I think 17 that we are in the process of getting change, and 18 I look forward to a new structured postseason 19 football. Thank you. 20 (Applause) 21 MR. TURNER: 22 Good afternoon. My name is Todd 23 Turner, and in 1976 I took my first job in 24 intercollegiate athletic administration as the 25 ticket manager at the University of Virginia. ALLIANCE REPORTING, INC. 4919 Canal Street - Suite 303 New Orleans, Louisiana 70119 (504) 488-6624 35 1 That was a long time ago. Since then I've been 2 the product of three major conferences, the Big 3 East, the Atlantic Coast Conference, and the 4 Southeastern Conference, and I've worked at four 5 very prominent Division I institutions. I think 6 over the period of 27 years, I've had the good 7 fortune of developing, really through the school 8 of hard knocks as much as anything else, a full 9 understanding of the investments that 10 universities at that elite level have made in 11 their programs, and understand full well the 12 resulting pressures that have emanated out of 13 that that require success and require effective 14 management of the resources that we've been 15 given. 16 Seventeen years as an athletics 17 director of Division I, and I have never heard or 18 rarely heard discussion like we've heard today 19 about reforming intercollegiate athletics, and 20 that's really encouraging. And, Doctor Cowen, 21 thank you for assembling this group to begin this 22 dialogue. I only wish that it could be carried 23 on beyond the city limits of New Orleans and 24 throughout our association, Doctor Brandon, to 25 the point where these sort of things are in the ALLIANCE REPORTING, INC. 4919 Canal Street - Suite 303 New Orleans, Louisiana 70119 (504) 488-6624 36 1 board rooms of our colleges and universities and 2 really make a difference. 3 Today I want to talk about reform, 4 I want to talk about the BCS, I want to talk 5 about unfunded mandates, and lastly I mention 6 student athletes. What's driven today's reform 7 movement? Is it a desire to reign in big-time 8 athletics and to make it more compatible with the 9 true mission and goals of higher education, or is 10 it really about economics? As much as I hate to 11 say it, outside of today's discussion, the talk 12 appears to me to be more about money and pride 13 than it is about higher education's core values. 14 The hypocrisy of that is stifling. 15 All too often money and market 16 share take precedent over academic and cultural 17 priorities, and given as much a close look at 18 Division IA postseason football becomes a 19 commentary on higher education's athletics values 20 as much as it is on the strength of any football 21 team or conference. Well, how did we get into 22 this position? What could we have done to avoid 23 it? What can it teach us as we move forward? 24 These questions deserve our strongest 25 consideration. ALLIANCE REPORTING, INC. 4919 Canal Street - Suite 303 New Orleans, Louisiana 70119 (504) 488-6624 37 1 I think it's important to have an 2 appropriate historical backdrop for analyzing 3 kind of where we are today and how we've gotten 4 there, so allow me to do this. I want to talk 5 about unfunded mandates. 6 In the 1970s, Title IX compliance 7 became an appropriate and much overdue mandate, 8 yet few if any institutions chose to earmark 9 money from central university funds to support 10 the growth of women's sports programs; rather, 11 they looked at the revenue-generating programs on 12 the men's side to provide the needed capital. 13 Some common sense economics resulted in some very 14 good cost containment ideas such as limits on 15 scholarships, coaching staffs, schedules; but, 16 unfortunately, these limitations also became 17 unfunded mandates that defined commitment and 18 competitiveness. How could you be committed if 19 you didn't fully fund 85 football scholarships 20 and have nine full-time assistant football 21 coaches? For some, even these were beyond what 22 they could afford, yet without them they were 23 second-class citizens missing out on the rewards 24 and the benefits of big-time college football, 25 and after all, at the end of the day ALLIANCE REPORTING, INC. 4919 Canal Street - Suite 303 New Orleans, Louisiana 70119 (504) 488-6624 38 1 institutional ego was at risk. 2 The decade of the '80s saw 3 universities, and athletic departments in 4 particular, scramble to find ways to respond to 5 these unfunded mandates. We chased the 6 all-important dollar from every conceivable 7 source. Results are all too familiar today: 11 8 A.M. and 9 P.M. kick-off times, midweek games, 9 giant TV screens with sponsored replays, 10 corporate signages everywhere, naming rights, 11 donation-driven priority seating, and luxury 12 suites and boxes for the VIPs. When coupled with 13 changes that emerged in the sports media 14 industry, 24-hour sports reporting, internet chat 15 rooms, life call-in radio, the pressure to win 16 and to maximize revenues was greater than ever 17 before. The cost of competing in the big time 18 was greater than ever: bigger stadiums, bigger 19 weight rooms, new practice facilities, higher 20 paid coaches. The powerful further distanced 21 themselves from the powder puffs. 22 The results of that pressure have 23 not been lost on our coaches and they've not been 24 lost on the athletes. Coaches under the mandate 25 to fill the coffers and win or be gone are now ALLIANCE REPORTING, INC. 4919 Canal Street - Suite 303 New Orleans, Louisiana 70119 (504) 488-6624 39 1 paid like movie stars. Some, in fact, have 2 become bigger than life, bigger than the game, 3 bigger than the institutions that they serve. 4 And student athletes have become frighteningly 5 close to being the means to an end as opposed to 6 the reason for being. 7 Institutions reacting to this spiral 8 of commercialism began to respond in the late 9 '80s and into the decade of the '90s with rules 10 and programs geared at protecting the "student" 11 in "student athlete." Closer scrutiny of 12 graduation rates and overall academic performance 13 fueled new rules and campus support systems. New 14 NCAA rules raised the bar for entering students, 15 and other measures were adopted to better ensure 16 that student athletes completed their degrees. 17 Consequently, academic support programs sprung up 18 in the athletics department. Champs Life Skills 19 programs followed as student welfare become yet 20 another unfunded mandate. 21 For the big boys, and what I mean by 22 that is those that had earned enough clout in the 23 marketplace, responding to these types of 24 challenges forced them to again rely upon their 25 popularity to generate the resources needed to ALLIANCE REPORTING, INC. 4919 Canal Street - Suite 303 New Orleans, Louisiana 70119 (504) 488-6624 40 1 meet the new challenges. Conference expansion 2 with divisional play and championship games 3 capitalized on the public's insatiable interest 4 in elite competition and winning. 5 It seems as if the landscape changes 6 almost daily. The gaps widened between those 7 with market clout and those without, further 8 frustrating those that are left in the dust of 9 the "haves." "Crown a champion" became the cry 10 of the sports media and the sports fan. In our 11 part of the world, preserving the bowl tradition 12 and growing revenues became the goal of the 13 athletic director and the goal of the 14 commissioners and the goal of the coaches. 15 First it was the Bowl Coalition in 16 1992, then the Bowl Alliance in 1995, and now 17 it's the BCS. Postseason football is in the eye 18 of the storm, and it's very little to do with the 19 educational values and student athletes. More 20 than anything else, it's about economics, 21 institutional pride, and power. It is not about 22 access. The non-BCS schools have never had 23 access. It's about money, it's about ego, and 24 it's about control. 25 Here we are in 2003. We've got our ALLIANCE REPORTING, INC. 4919 Canal Street - Suite 303 New Orleans, Louisiana 70119 (504) 488-6624 41 1 heads down, we're working hard to try to reform 2 intercollegiate athletics, but what kind of 3 reform is it? Is it academic reform? cultural 4 reform? competitive reform? postseason football 5 reform? Where should we be putting our energy to 6 serve the ideals of higher education? Should we 7 focus our attention on the economics of 8 postseason football, or should we be channeling 9 our best efforts to protect the ideal of the 10 student athlete in amateur intercollegiate 11 athletics? 12 I, for one, believe that postseason 13 football should be left to the marketplace to 14 decide who plays and what it pays. That's the 15 American way. Let the public decide what's 16 valuable and what's it's worth. And decide they 17 will. They'll decide with those remote TV 18 clickers, and they'll decide with their 19 checkbooks and credit cards. 20 The BCS's focus at the moment: Is 21 it fair? Is it a cartel? Is it in restraint of 22 trade? Is it in the best interest of college 23 football? Is it in the best interest of higher 24 ed? The answers to these questions are as varied 25 as the academic traditions and the programs at ALLIANCE REPORTING, INC. 4919 Canal Street - Suite 303 New Orleans, Louisiana 70119 (504) 488-6624 42 1 the 117 Division IA playing football 2 institutions. 3 For those with competitively strong 4 programs, with huge fan followings, and 5 mind-boggling investments in their sports 6 programs, the BCS makes perfect sense. It's the 7 next best thing available to help fund the 8 unfunded mandates of the past and present. For 9 those who aspire to this tier of leverage, the 10 BCS is exclusionary, but so is inclusion in the 11 American Association of Universities and Phi Beta 12 Kappa where you're not included simply because 13 you have a nice library or you pay your faculty 14 well. You must earn membership. Likewise, 15 membership in the BCS has to be earned. 16 The separation of the football 17 "haves" of the BCS conference from the non-BCS 18 institutions isn't new. This is borne out in the 19 history of postseason football. Here are some 20 interesting facts that have emerged out of a bowl 21 history that now spans over 100 years and 22 includes well over 250 major bowl games. 23 In the 25 years before the formation 24 of the Bowl Coalition, the Bowl Alliance, and the 25 BCS, only six non-BCS schools played in one of ALLIANCE REPORTING, INC. 4919 Canal Street - Suite 303 New Orleans, Louisiana 70119 (504) 488-6624 43 1 the four BCS bowls. That's the Orange, the 2 Sugar, the Fiesta, and the Rose. That accounts 3 for just 3.1 percent of the bowl opportunities 4 during that period of time. In the 40 years 5 prior to the coalition's formation in 1992, there 6 have been only eight non-BCS schools among the 7 304 participants in the BCS bowls. That's a 8 participation rate of 2.6 percent. Yet in 2004 9 the BCS will share 5 percent of its projected 10 $89.9 million in revenue with non-BCS Division IA 11 institutions. That amounts to just about $4.5 12 million. It has also doubled the percentage of 13 participation by non-BCS schools in these bowls 14 in the 40 years before the BCS came into 15 existence. 16 The fact of the matter is that 17 non-BCS schools have never had significant access 18 to the BCS bowls, and the reality is that non-BCS 19 schools now have more of a share of the financial 20 benefits from the four major BCS bowls than ever 21 before. 22 So, what now? It's not 23 inconceivable that BCS conferences and Notre Dame 24 would at some point create their own football 25 association. Call it Division IV, call it ALLIANCE REPORTING, INC. 4919 Canal Street - Suite 303 New Orleans, Louisiana 70119 (504) 488-6624 44 1 Division IV-A, call it the College Football 2 Association. That's a familiar name. The new 3 organization -- let's call it the CFA -- would 4 set its own rules of membership and for managing 5 its football programs, recruiting, staffing, 6 eligibility, scholarships, and postseason 7 competition. All would remain good Division I 8 members of the NCAA living by the rules of 9 Division I for all other sports and contributing 10 their assets to the benefit of all Division I 11 members through the various NCAA championships, 12 such as the NCAA Division I Men's Basketball 13 Championship. 14 And what about access? Access to 15 the CFA would most likely be a matter of 16 commitment and following. Commitment in terms of 17 scholarships, staffing, scheduling and budget; 18 following in terms of attendance, television 19 ratings and media interest; and at the end of the 20 day, the market would determine who had access. 21 You want me to hurry up? I'm on a 22 roll. 23 MR. ELMORE: 24 I'm sure there are going to be a lot 25 of questions. ALLIANCE REPORTING, INC. 4919 Canal Street - Suite 303 New Orleans, Louisiana 70119 (504) 488-6624 45 1 MR. TURNER: 2 I've got just a little more. This 3 is the important part about student athletes that 4 I want to mention. 5 All of this is to say that our 6 energies and efforts to reform intercollegiate 7 athletics are misplaced if we direct them solely 8 at postseason football. Postseason football will 9 take care of itself if we take care of the core 10 valves that define the playing field. 11 We need to be focused upon changing 12 the athletics culture that has evolved on our 13 campuses. Our number one priority should be to 14 better define the interface between academics and 15 athletics. The two must be more compatible, and 16 you don't achieve it by debating the economics of 17 postseason football. When we make it every bit 18 as prestigious to boast a 100 percent graduation 19 rate as it is to win the SEC or Big 10 title, 20 then we've made some progress. Reform is more 21 than restructuring postseason play, it's ensuring 22 that the values and the mission of higher ed are 23 primary in the athletics enterprise. 24 Winning on the field will always be 25 important. It's an important measure of ALLIANCE REPORTING, INC. 4919 Canal Street - Suite 303 New Orleans, Louisiana 70119 (504) 488-6624 46 1 excellence. So if you can't win unless your 2 athletes are actively-engaged students, then 3 behavior and priorities will change to 4 accommodate winning. That's an important 5 thought. Our academic progress rules need to 6 change to enable competitive advantages to those 7 that abide by them. When this happens, the 8 national champion, no matter how you choose to 9 crown them, will truly represent all that is good 10 about athletics, student athletes, and higher 11 education. Thanks. 12 (Applause) 13 MR. ELMORE: 14 I knew there was a reason why I 15 saved you for last. 16 At this point we'd like to open up 17 the floor for any questions. You've heard some 18 pretty distinct views not only on athletics 19 reform but specifically on the postseason play in 20 the BCS. So I'm sure everyone is not of the same 21 thought out here in the audience as well, so if 22 you have some questions, please step up to the 23 mike. Anyone? 24 AUDIENCE MEMBER: 25 Since this was just discussed, I ALLIANCE REPORTING, INC. 4919 Canal Street - Suite 303 New Orleans, Louisiana 70119 (504) 488-6624 47 1 direct it at Mr. Turner. I think the issue with 2 access for non-BCS schools is not necessarily the 3 four bowls that happen to be part of the BCS. 4 Before the BCS was invented, those four bowls did 5 not control who was the national champion. Most 6 often the national champion ended up playing in 7 one of those bowls, but the Cotton Bowl, Holiday 8 Bowl have produced national champions as well. 9 The access issue is about who ends up being 10 national champion and not about who happened to 11 play in those specific bowls. I think that's the 12 point that many fans and coaches, administrators 13 from non-BCS schools are arguing; not that they 14 want to be part of those specific bowls, but that 15 they want an actual chance at a national 16 championship. 17 MR. TURNER: 18 That's a perfect comment. I raised 19 the issue about a Division IV or a different kind 20 of a championship only for the purposes of 21 generating some discussion. Frankly, I don't 22 know how we're going to avoid at some point not 23 having a play-off. It seems to me to be headed 24 in that direction, to be fair. But the context 25 of how we get to that, I think all of Division I ALLIANCE REPORTING, INC. 4919 Canal Street - Suite 303 New Orleans, Louisiana 70119 (504) 488-6624 48 1 needs to understand the levels of investment and 2 the levels of history that the current BCS 3 schools have got invested in this thing, and it's 4 going to be hard for them to walk away from that. 5 MEMBER OF SYMPOSIUM ORGANIZATION STAFF: 6 Len, I just wanted to remind 7 everyone who's asking a question to identify 8 themselves by their name and affiliation. Thank 9 you. 10 MR. ELMORE: 11 And your name? No, just kidding. 12 MR. SWILER: 13 My name is Carl Swiler. I'm just an 14 alumni of Tulane. I wanted to point out that the 15 University of Cincinnati and Louisville are both 16 leaving Conference USA to join the Big East. 17 Well, suddenly then they become BCS-eligible. 18 What does that say of Conference USA and the 19 remaining teams in Conference USA, and they are 20 not BCS-eligible? 21 MR. BANOWSKY: 22 I think the whole system is under 23 review right now, and to suggest -- and Craig 24 might have a perspective on this -- to suggest 25 that the Big East as a conference is the same now ALLIANCE REPORTING, INC. 4919 Canal Street - Suite 303 New Orleans, Louisiana 70119 (504) 488-6624 49 1 without Miami and Virginia Tech and now Boston 2 College in terms of strength in the sport of 3 football going forward I think is a question mark 4 that has yet to be determined. 5 From purposes of Conference USA, I 6 mean, obviously we hate to see any of our members 7 move on to other conferences, and we really enjoy 8 and will continue to enjoy until the time they 9 leave, our affiliation with the folks at both 10 Cincinnati and Louisville and the other schools 11 that are leaving. But I know that Doctor Cowen 12 shares this view, and I certainly do, that in 13 many ways creating realignment can be a very 14 logical, positive opportunity, and that's 15 certainly the way that we're looking at it. The 16 opportunity to group institutions together that 17 are more compatible, the opportunity to have more 18 geographic proximity, fans to travel to games, 19 you know, be able to put it in a better 20 perspective is something that we look at as a 21 positive. So I think most of us don't view the 22 changes along conference lines of being 23 particularly negative relative to Conference USA. 24 MR. DAIGLE: 25 Mr. Turner, my name is Jim Daigle, ALLIANCE REPORTING, INC. 4919 Canal Street - Suite 303 New Orleans, Louisiana 70119 (504) 488-6624 50 1 and I'd like to know why Baylor is more 2 BCS-worthy than TCU, and why Vanderbilt is more 3 BCS-worthy than Tulane University. That is so 4 illogical that I don't understand it, except that 5 they're in a conference. But the institutions 6 don't bring anything that an Alabama or a 7 Tennessee brings, but they're on the coattail and 8 they derive the benefit, and I think it's unfair 9 to institutions like Tulane and TCU. 10 MR. TURNER: 11 And I don't disagree with your 12 premise. The thing that I would say is that just 13 as Cincinnati and Louisville have entered the 14 BCS, it's not inconceivable that a Vanderbilt and 15 a Baylor would some day drop back from the BCS. 16 MR. DAIGLE: 17 Drop back or be asked to leave? 18 MR. TURNER: 19 One or the other, it makes no 20 difference. 21 MR. DAIGLE: 22 But that's not fair either, is it? 23 MR. TURNER: 24 Well, the marketplace decides that. 25 I'll give you an example. And I have some great ALLIANCE REPORTING, INC. 4919 Canal Street - Suite 303 New Orleans, Louisiana 70119 (504) 488-6624 51 1 friends that are in these institutions, and it's 2 not meant to reflect negatively on them, but it's 3 about market and it's about popularity. 4 When Southern Cal played TCU in the 5 Sun Bowl, it was a great opportunity for TCU. It 6 generated the lowest rating number in the history 7 of the Sun Bowl on television. That's a 8 market-driven thing, has nothing to do with the 9 people at TCU or the fact that they are a 10 fabulous place, because they have done an 11 exceptional job there, but the market was not 12 ready for -- there was no interest in TCU's 13 participation. That could very well change. 14 They are very good. And I think that our system 15 has to allow for changes in the marketplace that 16 are determined by the public and by the 17 investments the university is making. 18 MR. DAIGLE: 19 But if it were a basket of 20 institutions, and all the institutions 21 participated, and the money was bundled to be 22 shared by the whole, you wouldn't have that 23 problem. 24 And the other question I want to ask 25 perhaps of President Brand is: How can the NCAA ALLIANCE REPORTING, INC. 4919 Canal Street - Suite 303 New Orleans, Louisiana 70119 (504) 488-6624 52 1 regulate academics of the universities, regulate 2 what they can and can't pay, and regulate what 3 alumni can do in respect to summer jobs, etc., 4 etc., etc., but the NCAA cannot do anything about 5 the situation of which we speak at the moment? 6 MR. BRAND: 7 You're not the first person to ask 8 that question, and here is the answer: We're a 9 membership organization. The NCAA national 10 office has the powers granted to it by the 11 individual institutions. 12 MR. DAIGLE: 13 Who are the institutions? 14 MR. BRAND: 15 It's the thousand institutions that 16 make up the NCAA, in Division IA the 117, as 17 represented by the presidents. They decide what 18 they're going to ask the NCAA to do, what powers 19 it has, and they retain for themselves other 20 powers. The institutions have autonomy, and 21 they've always retained for themselves far more 22 power than they've ceded to the NCAA. In all the 23 areas you talked about, they have formally ceded 24 those powers to the NCAA, but in Division IA 25 football -- and this is unique because in no ALLIANCE REPORTING, INC. 4919 Canal Street - Suite 303 New Orleans, Louisiana 70119 (504) 488-6624 53 1 other subdivision or championship has this 2 happened -- but in IA football they have decided, 3 the presidents who are the decision-makers here, 4 have decided to retain the powers for postseason 5 football to themselves. 6 Someone mentioned at the earlier 7 panel discussion that this is, at least in part, 8 an outgrowth of a mid-1980 Supreme Court decision 9 which took away the sole authority of the NCAA to 10 control not only postseason football but season 11 football as well, and that led to the conferences 12 getting together to manage the situation and 13 create media contracts by themselves, and that's 14 how we find ourselves in this situation to begin 15 with. So we moved away from that in the 16 mid-'80s, and that power has never been returned 17 through the presidents by those institutions to 18 the NCAA. That's the facts of the matter. 19 MR. ELMORE: 20 Thank you, Doctor Brand. Peter? 21 MR. DALIS: 22 It's interesting you bring up the 23 model of Baylor and why it is where it is, and I 24 talked a little bit about the external community 25 that influences so much of what goes on in ALLIANCE REPORTING, INC. 4919 Canal Street - Suite 303 New Orleans, Louisiana 70119 (504) 488-6624 54 1 athletics. Several years ago the Pac-10 was 2 looking at some expansion preliminarily, and we 3 looked at the University of Texas as one 4 potential while they were still in the Southwest 5 Conference, and what we found was that in order 6 to take Texas, you had to take Baylor. Why? 7 Because the state legislature was so heavily 8 influenced by Baylor graduates that they were not 9 going to allow the abandonment of Baylor as a 10 major playing institution. 11 MR. ELMORE: 12 The moral of that story is: Elect 13 Tulane graduates to the legislature. 14 (Laughter) 15 MR. ELMORE: 16 Let me ask a quick question playing 17 on Todd's mention of the marketplace. Many 18 people have said that the difference between BCS 19 eligible schools and non-BCS eligible schools has 20 to do with stadium size, fan base, fan support 21 at bowl games and TV ratings. Todd mentioned you 22 have to earn a position. Some people would ask, 23 Craig, why don't the non-BCS schools simply 24 upgrade their programs and wait for the 25 marketplace to dictate? You know, you talked ALLIANCE REPORTING, INC. 4919 Canal Street - Suite 303 New Orleans, Louisiana 70119 (504) 488-6624 55 1 about a branding issue. Obviously, that's an 2 obstacle, but why isn't that a reality? They've 3 had the amount of time since the agreement up 4 until now to be able to do that to earn that 5 membership. 6 MR. THOMPSON: 7 Well, and I argue that marketplace, 8 Len, in that for example BYU, the plaster is 9 still wet on a $30 million indoor facility. Our 10 eight institutions -- and I can speak for the 11 Mountain West and nobody else -- but our eight 12 institutions have expended in excess of $200 13 million in football-related facilities and 14 upgrades just for that specific sport in the last 15 five years, so I buy into that equity for so 16 long. I've been at a lot of institutions, I 17 travel every Saturday. I'm not going to 18 denigrate other conferences, but I've been in a 19 lot of places that those people aren't quite 20 making the equity commitment that some of the top 21 level people in their conferences are as well, 22 so it is not fair across the board. 23 I think in terms of interest, the 24 television ratings are pretty consistent. It 25 doesn't matter, I could take eleven from this ALLIANCE REPORTING, INC. 4919 Canal Street - Suite 303 New Orleans, Louisiana 70119 (504) 488-6624 56 1 side and eleven from that side and tell you what 2 the rating is going to be if it's Thursday at 3 7:30, if it's Friday at 8:00, or if it's Saturday 4 at 9:00. It's not necessarily who is playing, 5 it's the time slot in the day of the week, and I 6 think that's been pretty consistent through the 7 last couple of years. 8 Going back to the bowl thing, you 9 know, the argument is made that the 54 non-BCS 10 people didn't participate in those four major 11 bowls before the BCS. Well, if you recall, for 12 the last 50-some years the Rose Bowl has been 13 exclusively the Big 10 and the Pac-10, and the 14 SEC has basically come to the Sugar Bowl for 15 decades, and the Big 8 and the Big 12 went to the 16 Orange Bowl for decades. Those bowls weren't 17 open even before the BCS, the BCA, or anything in 18 the precursor of the early '90s. The other 19 interesting fact, I think is -- I don't know the 20 statistic, but if you would go back and chart, 21 out of the 63 BCS institutions, probably a third 22 or less have ever participated in those four 23 bowls either. I don't think Baylor has been to a 24 whole lot of Rose Bowls. Well, I just mentioned 25 Rose Bowl. Bad example. Orange Bowl, et ALLIANCE REPORTING, INC. 4919 Canal Street - Suite 303 New Orleans, Louisiana 70119 (504) 488-6624 57 1 cetera. I think that if you look back, it's 2 always been a very high level. We're probably 3 talking legitimately out of the 63 BCS 4 institutions, 20 to 25 that do have a higher 5 equity investment in football and have 6 participated in not only those four bowls but 7 other bowls. 8 MR. BANOWSKY: 9 I think I would agree with most of 10 what Craig said. You look at our universities, 11 I mean, they were compelled to upgrade their 12 facilities. They spent -- we did our research -- 13 $300 million in the last five years on new 14 stadiums, new indoor practice facilities and so 15 on. You know, the marketplace, defining the 16 marketplace, who defines the marketplace? 17 Generally speaking, it's the networks that own 18 all the media contracts and decide who plays whom 19 on what dates, and those are relationships that 20 are long-term relationships with, guess who, the 21 BCS conferences, and those relationships have 22 been in existence for a long time. Is there 23 opportunity for others to enter the marketplace? 24 I think that's a real question in this system 25 right now, and I think that our folks have ALLIANCE REPORTING, INC. 4919 Canal Street - Suite 303 New Orleans, Louisiana 70119 (504) 488-6624 58 1 consistently said give us a chance to compete, 2 and we can show our worth in the marketplace. 3 MR. ELMORE: 4 Just to put a period on that, you 5 know, the question of upgrading the programs also 6 sounds like the beginnings of an arms race, but 7 they did that in the former panel. We won't get 8 into that. 9 Very quickly, we have sat here and 10 discussed the BCS and the fairness and 11 unfairness, but we all know that right here in 12 the Crescent City on November 16th there's going 13 to be a summit meeting essentially with the 14 presidents of both sides coming together. Maybe 15 our panelists, as we close out this panel, we 16 only have maybe four or five minutes left, so 17 maybe you guys can limit your remarks to about a 18 minute, but what do you expect the presidents to 19 do? With this body of argument out there, with 20 the facts that have been thrown back and forth, 21 what do you expect them to do? And, quite 22 honestly, what leverage, if any, do the non-BCS 23 schools have in a meeting like this, short of 24 threatening a lawsuit? 25 Do we want to start with you, Todd, ALLIANCE REPORTING, INC. 4919 Canal Street - Suite 303 New Orleans, Louisiana 70119 (504) 488-6624 59 1 since you went last? 2 MR. TURNER: 3 I expect that the outcome will be 4 opening somewhat access for the non-BCS 5 conferences to participate. 6 MR. ELMORE: 7 Any idea of how? 8 MR. TURNER: 9 Probably a fifth game. 10 MR. ELMORE: 11 Craig? 12 MR. THOMPSON: 13 I would agree with Todd. I don't 14 know that it's necessarily a fifth game. I think 15 there will be increased access. An earlier 16 comment, I think ultimately that there's going to 17 be a lot of pressure and a hard look at a 18 play-off. I don't know if it will come in this 19 2006 edition or not. 20 MR. BANOWSKY: 21 I don't know what the specific 22 outcomes will be, but my sense is these 23 presidents really want to try and improve the 24 system from all sides, and so I expect there to 25 be some really quality dialogue and an agreement ALLIANCE REPORTING, INC. 4919 Canal Street - Suite 303 New Orleans, Louisiana 70119 (504) 488-6624 60 1 to develop a plan going forward. 2 MR. ELMORE: 3 Peter, you were the proponent of a 4 play-off. Within that particular answer, what 5 format would a play-off take, and how could they 6 reconcile it obviously with the idea of extra 7 games? Would it eliminate some of the conference 8 tournaments? Would it mean playing deeper into 9 January? 10 MR. DALIS: 11 It would definitely mean playing 12 deeper into January for at least four schools. I 13 think the original proposal would eliminate all 14 the preseason games as one potential elimination, 15 but I think that would be it. I don't know of 16 the correct model, and quite honestly, I don't 17 think we're going to see a play-off real quick. 18 I just think there's so much resistance in higher 19 education, that I don't think it's real, I really 20 don't. I think it's more perception than reality 21 in terms of the ills that it would produce, but 22 that's just a 65-year-old retired guy saying 23 that. 24 MR. ELMORE: 25 With an awful lot of experience. ALLIANCE REPORTING, INC. 4919 Canal Street - Suite 303 New Orleans, Louisiana 70119 (504) 488-6624 61 1 The final question, though, that we 2 asked is: What do you expect the presidents to 3 do in this meeting? Anything concrete? 4 MR. DALIS: 5 I agree with the other panelists. I 6 think there will be an attempt to have some 7 movement to reconcile, and I believe the fifth 8 game is probably the most realistic. 9 MR. ELMORE: 10 Well, there you have it, folks. 11 We've got one more question. 12 MR. DAIGLE: 13 Why don't the presidents say, 14 quote, "It's the money, baby," close quote, and 15 not say it's the academics that prevent a 16 play-off? 17 MR. ELMORE: 18 That's a good question. We've been 19 saying that here today that it's certainly about 20 the money. There's a lot of candor out there, 21 and I think that a lot of people have admitted 22 that; but the fact is, there's got to be a 23 balance. 24 MR. DALIS: 25 And I think there's always a benign ALLIANCE REPORTING, INC. 4919 Canal Street - Suite 303 New Orleans, Louisiana 70119 (504) 488-6624 62 1 tension on most academic campuses about 2 athletics. It really is a juggling act in a lot 3 of ways. In some cases they just don't want to 4 see athletics go too far, as was spoken about 5 this morning. I think that's just a reality. 6 MR. ELMORE: 7 I think this is the last question 8 that we can support here. 9 MR. KERMIT HALL: 10 I think, Len, it may turn out to be 11 a comment more than a question. I'm Kermit Hall 12 from Utah State University. It's fabulous to 13 have all of you speculating about what I'm going 14 to do on Sunday. I welcome, however, the 15 guidance and counsel. 16 MR. ELMORE: 17 That's the spirit in which it was 18 given. 19 MR. HALL: 20 Oh, no, absolutely. But 21 soothsaying, especially in this context, is a 22 particularly challenging enterprise. I do think 23 that one of the interesting moments in this 24 entire discussion occurred a couple of weeks ago 25 when we were in Washington with Chancellor ALLIANCE REPORTING, INC. 4919 Canal Street - Suite 303 New Orleans, Louisiana 70119 (504) 488-6624 63 1 Perlman and some of the other discussion that 2 surrounded this issue, and I would say from at 3 least this president's perspective, and I would 4 use the words that Chancellor Perlman used 5 representing his BCS colleagues, that there is no 6 functional reason why there cannot be postseason 7 play-off that would culminate in the designation 8 of a national champion in Division I based on 9 what happens in the playing field as opposed to 10 what happens in cyberspace. That being said, 11 whether or not we get to that point I think is in 12 question, but Division II and Division III I 13 think probably have something to teach us in this 14 regard, and I was so thrilled and so pleased that 15 with the prodding of Senators Biden, Hatch and 16 Dewine, that Chancellor Perlman, in representing 17 his colleagues, was willing to attest to the fact 18 that there's no functional reason why it can't be 19 done. 20 (Applause) 21 MR. ELMORE: 22 And as we have tried to do all 23 afternoon is pretty much save the best for last, 24 so with that comment I'd like to again thank 25 President Cowen, Tulane University, all the folks ALLIANCE REPORTING, INC. 4919 Canal Street - Suite 303 New Orleans, Louisiana 70119 (504) 488-6624 64 1 who worked so diligently in putting this 2 together, and I thank you for the opportunity to 3 be a part of this. And my panelists, thank you 4 for your insight and input and your courage. At 5 the end of the day, I think it's food for 6 thought. You know, there's an awful lot that we 7 have to start thinking about with regard to 8 athletics reform, and particularly this issue as 9 it's on the front burner. 10 And I think one other thing -- and 11 Doctor Brand was so gracious to step up to the 12 mike -- is that as the general public, we still 13 need to understand what it is that the NCAA does 14 and can do, the reaches of its authority, and 15 once we have fully understood that, we as a voice 16 can probably be more effective in bringing about 17 the reforms that we need. Thanks again. 18 (Applause) 19 MR. COWEN: 20 I have the additional task of 21 closing remarks, trying to bring this all 22 together today. Of course, I think there's such 23 a richness and density to the remarks, it's 24 almost impossible to do. But I want to start 25 first of all with a big thank-you. I want to ALLIANCE REPORTING, INC. 4919 Canal Street - Suite 303 New Orleans, Louisiana 70119 (504) 488-6624 65 1 thank all our panelists, the ones we've just had 2 here, our prior panel, and Myles Brand for being 3 with us today. It took a lot of time for them to 4 come here to be with us this afternoon, and I 5 think it was well worth it, so would you join me 6 one more time in thanking all of them? 7 (Applause) 8 MR. COWEN: 9 You know, the purpose really of 10 today's symposium was education. We didn't 11 expect today to have agreement on any issues, but 12 what we did expect today was to come away with a 13 greater understanding of what are the issues that 14 are really facing us in higher education as it 15 comes to intercollegiate athletics; and I don't 16 know about you, but I think we have achieved 17 that. 18 I have four take-aways from today 19 that I wrote down, and I suspect you'll have your 20 own list. First of all, listening to Myles today 21 at lunch, I am once again affirmed that the 22 collegiate model of athletics really should be 23 preserved, and that we should prevent any further 24 movement from that model to the professional 25 model. I think everyone agrees to that. We know ALLIANCE REPORTING, INC. 4919 Canal Street - Suite 303 New Orleans, Louisiana 70119 (504) 488-6624 66 1 that is a difficult task, but yet just the mere 2 fact that we have acknowledged it I think is 3 important. 4 I think the other thing from Myles' 5 speech today that really resonated with me was 6 this idea that collegiate athletics should be 7 supported for the value it brings to the academy, 8 not looked at as a source of support for the 9 academy, and I mean financial support. And the 10 message there, quite honestly, is we somehow have 11 to discipline ourselves to think about athletics 12 much more in terms of the values and principles 13 and missions of our institutions and a lot less 14 about just the revenue and the money it's 15 generating, and I think that's an important 16 message. 17 In the panel that we had that Tom 18 McMillen was so gracious to host and I was part 19 of, along with Bill and Jim, I think what you 20 heard was a couple of messages from both retired 21 presidents and a current president that 22 collegiate athletics has strayed from the values 23 and missions of our universities, and reform or a 24 total rethinking is needed. And I know for many 25 of you that was probably very depressing because ALLIANCE REPORTING, INC. 4919 Canal Street - Suite 303 New Orleans, Louisiana 70119 (504) 488-6624 67 1 you wanted to hear some good news out there. But 2 the fact of the matter is, there are problems 3 that affect us every single day in our 4 institutions, and we have to address these 5 problems, and that's what you heard today. 6 What you see many times as fans and 7 alumni is what's going on in the field and the 8 excitement it generates, and we're all very happy 9 about that, because it does bring a sense of 10 identity and community to our institutions; but 11 behind what you see on that field is a myriad of 12 issues that has a ripple effect in everything we 13 do at our institutions. 14 So I think you heard from the 15 presidents today that there's real concern about 16 whether athletics has strayed so far from our 17 mission and values that it's having an adverse 18 effect on the entire enterprise of higher 19 education. And I think you also heard the notion 20 of: Is it fixable? Will an incremental approach 21 really do the job, or does it need a radical 22 change or transformation? 23 Well, I suspect we all, especially 24 in higher education, would like to sit down with 25 a clean piece of paper and do a radical ALLIANCE REPORTING, INC. 4919 Canal Street - Suite 303 New Orleans, Louisiana 70119 (504) 488-6624 68 1 transformation, but I don't think that's going to 2 happen. So the question is: Are we going about 3 reform in a thoughtful way? And in that regard I 4 have a happy message, I think. I am more 5 optimistic today than I was five years ago about 6 our efforts to reform athletics, and I go back 7 again to the academic reform efforts underway 8 right now with the NCAA. I think that is the 9 most positive thing that could have a 10 transformative effect on intercollegiate 11 athletics if we maintain teeth in that 12 legislation, if we really execute it, and people 13 take it seriously. And I do think that issue is 14 so much larger than the BCS issue or any other 15 issue that we're talking about. So in that 16 second panel, I think you just heard the 17 frustrations that presidents have when we deal 18 with these issues every day. 19 The third panel I thought was also 20 very interesting because, first of all, they had 21 a much more balanced view of athletics and a 22 positive view, and that is encouraging, because 23 these athletic directors and the commissioners 24 are the ones that are working on these issues 25 every single day. And the one thing I have to ALLIANCE REPORTING, INC. 4919 Canal Street - Suite 303 New Orleans, Louisiana 70119 (504) 488-6624 69 1 say I've gotten out of this over the last five 2 and a half years working with my own athletic 3 director, Rick Dickson, who is magnificent, and 4 then having an opportunity to meet two new 5 athletic directors and commissioners, that these 6 are very fine, thoughtful people who do share the 7 same values and same qualities that we all do 8 about higher education. That is a source of 9 optimism to me, that there are people like this 10 and our own athletic director that share those 11 values that we all share and themselves are 12 grappling with these issues of how to bring 13 things back into sync with our institutions. 14 The Bowl Championship Series. 15 You've heard both sides of it today, and I really 16 want to thank Todd Turner. That was a courageous 17 thing, Todd, to come on my home court and do 18 that, but I think you needed to hear all sides 19 of that issue, because this has been one. The 20 one place where I would differ with Todd is, is 21 this is a lot more than just money. Because if 22 you take all the money off the table and leave 23 the system just the way it is, we'll still be 24 fighting for change, because anything that 25 creates the perception of a two-tiered system is ALLIANCE REPORTING, INC. 4919 Canal Street - Suite 303 New Orleans, Louisiana 70119 (504) 488-6624 70 1 harmful, and it hurts in recruiting, coaches, 2 student athletes and so on. So, as far as I'm 3 concerned, take all the money off the table, the 4 arguments are still going to be the same. But, 5 yet, there are very good arguments on both sides, 6 and we will I think this Sunday have what I think 7 will be a very productive and constructive 8 meeting. 9 The last thing I would say about 10 this last panel was that it was very refreshing 11 to me to see that the issues about athletics 12 reform that the presidents have and Myles has is 13 shared by all of them, and I suspect even the 14 grading system that Britton gave to many was not 15 a bad grading system about where we are and how 16 we feel about it, and there is comfort to know 17 that there is a confluence of evaluation in 18 interest amongst all of us. 19 And then the last thing is that 20 people have said over and over again: Athletics 21 reform is not a destination. This is a topic 22 that's going to be with us for many decades to 23 come. If you go back and read the history of 24 intercollegiate athletics ever since the NCAA was 25 formed in about 1906 or 1907, this has been a ALLIANCE REPORTING, INC. 4919 Canal Street - Suite 303 New Orleans, Louisiana 70119 (504) 488-6624 71 1 topic through every single generation. The 2 issues are larger, the money is more at stake, 3 but the topics are almost the same. So I think 4 we are at a time right now there's probably been 5 more education and discussion of athletics reform 6 than we've seen in recent years, and we in fact 7 are pleased to have that debate; and under Myles' 8 leadership, I suspect we'll see a lot more change 9 in a very positive way. 10 My last thank-you goes to Maureen 11 Devlin and the Knight Foundation. Maureen, I'd 12 like you to stand up to be acknowledged. I know 13 you don't like to be acknowledged, but I want you 14 to. 15 (Applause) 16 MR. COWEN: 17 The Knight Foundation has been a 18 group that has pushed for athletics reform for 19 many, many years, and I have followed them from 20 afar and been a great admirer of their work, and 21 Maureen was very helpful to us in just putting 22 this conference together, and most of all in 23 advancing once again the dialogue around these 24 important issues. So, Maureen, thank you and the 25 Knight Foundation. ALLIANCE REPORTING, INC. 4919 Canal Street - Suite 303 New Orleans, Louisiana 70119 (504) 488-6624 72 1 To all of you today, thank you for 2 being with us. I hope you took away something 3 that will make your life better, but most of all 4 will make athletics better. Thank you for being 5 with us. 6 (Applause) 7 * * * 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 ALLIANCE REPORTING, INC. 4919 Canal Street - Suite 303 New Orleans, Louisiana 70119 (504) 488-6624 73 1 REPORTER'S PAGE 2 I, SIMONE R. BERTUCCI, Certified Court 3 Reporter in and for the State of Louisiana, the 4 officer, as defined in Rule 28 of the Federal 5 Rules of Civil Procedure and/or Article 1434 (B) 6 of the Louisiana Code of Civil Procedure, before 7 whom this testimony was taken, do hereby state on 8 the record: 9 That due to the interaction in the 10 spontaneous discourse of this proceeding, dashes 11 (--) have been used to indicate pauses, changes 12 in thought, and/or talkovers; that same is the 13 proper method for the court reporter's 14 transcription of a proceeding, and that dashes 15 (--) do not indicate that words or phrases have 16 been left out of this transcript; also, that any 17 words and/or names which could not be verified 18 through reference material have been denoted with 19 the phrase "(spelled phonetically)." 20 ______________________________ 21 SIMONE R. BERTUCCI CERTIFIED COURT REPORTER 22 23 24 25 ALLIANCE REPORTING, INC. 4919 Canal Street - Suite 303 New Orleans, Louisiana 70119 (504) 488-6624 74 1 C E R T I F I C A T E 2 3 This certification is valid only when 4 bearing my original signature and official seal 5 on this page. 6 I, SIMONE R. BERTUCCI, pursuant to Rule 7 30(f) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 8 and/or Article 1446 A.(1) of the Louisiana Code 9 of Civil Procedure, do hereby certify that the 10 above and foregoing was reported by me in 11 stenotype, was prepared and transcribed by me or 12 under my personal direction and supervision, and 13 is a true and correct transcript to the best of 14 my ability and understanding. 15 16 ____________________________ 17 SIMONE R. BERTUCCI (#86155) Certified Court Reporter 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 ALLIANCE REPORTING, INC. 4919 Canal Street - Suite 303 New Orleans, Louisiana 70119 (504) 488-6624